How can we act for justice?

Moving beyond feeling overwhelmed and hopeless

When we talk about people seeking asylum and refugee policy in Australia (and in other countries!) many people get overwhelmed by the vast numbers of people who are displaced and the complexities involved in addressing their needs globally. Feeling overwhelmed, many Christians ask "But how can we do what the Bible teaches?"

While this is an incredibly complex issue to confront and advocate around we must not throw our hands up in the air and say, “This is too hard.” The fact is there are many alternative policies that Australia can adopt that will accomplish all we need to as a country and in a compassionate and loving way that honors and upholds the love of Christ.

Rather than feeling overwhelmed by looking at the complex, global picture, we can roll up our sleeves and have a good hard look at the specifics of our Australian policies, identifying where they fall short of our values and hurt people, how they can be changed, and what we can do to encourage our leaders to make those changes.

Our politicians are, of course, elected to represent the majority of their constituents. This presents us with a great opportunity - to speak up as constituents and let them know how they can best represent us!

Imagine what would happen if every Christian contacted their local members this week to advocate for people seeking asylum. Our leaders would quickly realise that a large group of Australian voters are serious about responding to the vulnerable with compassion and generosity and our advocacy would make a way for them to propose new policies of compassion and generosity within their parties!

Where do we start?

Specific policy suggestions to explore

Before beginning: Shake off any false narratives around the issue that stop you from thinking as clearly as you might if you were approaching it without having heard any prior debate.

For example, we've all heard people say "We can’t just open up the borders and let anyone who wants to come in! It isn’t safe!" But did you know that hardly anyone in the asylum seeker and refugee advocacy space believes that 'open borders' is a good idea? Even the Greens party does not have a policy of 'open borders'. It is a phrase that you really only hear mentioned by people who are trying to defend a policy of deterrence.

The phrase ‘open borders’ is political rhetoric designed to convince Australian voters that “deterrence is the only way” by making it seem like that the choice is between “open borders” and the harsh policies of deterrence we currently have. It’s a false dichotomy to serve a political purpose. Do we really have to treat people harshly in the hope of deterring them coming to us for safety? Is that the only way to look after Australia? Of course not. So let's take a fresh look.

1. Let’s start by increasing our humanitarian intake - As global citizens in a hurting world, Australia is currently not doing its fair share, with our current intake of refugees ranking us internationally at 50th overall, 67th on a per capita basis and 84th relative to GDP.1 Increasing our overall intake not only promotes the value of generosity, it allows us to accept our responsibility as global citizens, in line with the solemn promises we made as a nation to the world.2

2. Let’s make safe ways for people to journey - "Turning back the boats" is a cheap slogan that actually does nothing to 'save lives' as these people are still left without safety, and therefore still left needing to undertake other dangerous journeys in search of protection. If we were truly motivated to stop people drowning at sea, we would offer rescue services, not navy blockades. Let’s provide safe ways for people to journey, and actually protect them from those who might attempt to exploit them with offers of unsafe options.

3. Let’s provide safe and efficient processing right here in Australia - It goes without saying that Australia needs to end offshore processing as a measure of deterrence, as it has been consistently been reported (from many different types of sources) to be a very unsafe environment, and is both physically and psychologically damaging to people seeking asylum.4 In Australia, we can provide efficient, safe processing options that we can be proud of, by ensuring all people are treated with the dignity and respect.

4. Let’s be kind to our neighbours - Moving forward, there’s no need why we should continue our current ban on the resettlement of UNHCR refugees processed in Indonesia.

Furthermore, we can and should shoulder the responsibility of leading a regional response to people seeking asylum. We’d love to see Australia bring together other regional leaders, including Indigenous leaders, to find new solutions. Together, through truthful conversations, we believe regional leaders can find practical outcomes that work for the whole region (rather than for Australia alone).

In regional response like this, we’d love to see Australia willing to use its financial resources generously to enable the whole region to care best for people who seek asylum. Imagine how generous we could be if we directed the funds that we currently use in bilateral arrangements (that exploit the poorest countries in the region by providing financial incentives for them to take on Australia’s global responsibility in resettlement and processing), to regional solutions! 5

5. We know we’ve got to process people’s applications, so let’s do it well!

- Processing – One of the ways that Australia currently tries to deter people from seeking safety in Australia is with prolonged processing times. The average person spends 454 days in detention6 and they are not given adequate access to legal assistance7. Both of these must be addressed for justice to thrive. Let’s overhaul these systems until we have fast, fair, efficient processing, and let's provide people with the legal help they need along the way to ensure that we aren't sending anyone back to danger.

- Visas – Our current system of visas likewise seeks to deter people who come to Australia in search of asylum, with various restrictions in the length of time they are valid for, as well as obstacles that keep people in limbo (like not allowing them to work and support themselves, and restricting their access to services). To read about the specific visas and their restrictions, see Searching for Freedom: Refugee Week 2016 produced by Uniting Justice. We’d love to see our Government and community leaders sitting down with people seeking asylum, refugees, advocates and service care providers, and coming up with a new set of visas that are designed to allow new Australians to really flourish.

6. Transparency in leadership

- Public Briefing - As a matter of policy, our government leaders should brief the Australian public via the media when people seeking asylum arrive in Australia8 and when individual cases arise with specific cause for concern. At present, neither of these happen and, as we all know, accountability and transparency are important policies that we must protect, as they guard against corruption and the exploitation of minority groups.

- Legal protections for media, advocates, care givers and service providers - Our current government has passed measures that not only prevent media, advocates, caregivers and service providers from reporting what they know to the media, but that also puts them at risk of legal prosecution and jail time if they do. In an honest, democratic society, such measures are absolutely unnecessary. Furthermore, they create an environment where corruption can flourish, so really need to be avoided. We support legal protections that allow these Australians to act in accordance with their consciences.

- Language - The shameful truth is that, for many years, Australia’s public discourse has been dominated by language that promotes fear in Australian citizens and demonises people seeking asylum - a group of people who statistics show are in a genuinely desperate situation. Demonising language may get votes, but as Christians, we really need to say ‘Enough!’ on this one.

It’s simply not OK for anyone - especially our land’s elected representatives - to throw real humans under the proverbial bus by using language that is designed to make Australians afraid of them! Together, let's call foul every time our leaders use dehumanising and incorrect terms like 'illegals,' 'boat people' and 'queue jumpers'9, and ask them to replace them with terms that humanise like 'people seeking asylum' and 'people seeking safety'. As Christians who know that all humans are made in the image of God and have inherent value, we should champion this standard more than anyone!

Similarly, terms that are to do with defence, like 'border protection' should not be conflated with policies that deal with people seeking asylum. Let’s encourage our leaders to save the scary war terms for actual wars and instead speak with compassion when our fellow humans ask us for help, hey? Let’s be generous and compassionate - even in our language!

Find out how you can roll up your sleeves and make a stand for justice for people seeking asylum.

 

Want to know more? Follow the footnote links below to read some of the excellent resources we've learned from. And here are links to some of these policies for those that are interested in exploring the compassionate alternatives we can adopt as a country.

CPD report – Beyond the Boats

Law Council of Australia

Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees

Julian Burnside – The Tasmania Opportunity


1 Global Trends 2014, released by UNHCR, 2015.
2 Asylum seekers and refugees: what are the facts? by Janet Phillips, 2 March 2015.
3 Shelter from the Storm A Uniting Church in Australia Statement on Asylum Seeker & Refugee PolicyAdopted by the Fourteenth Assembly July 2015 Resolution 15.23.09, pg 37.
4 For just one example see the Moss Inquiry, Taking responsibility: conditions and circumstances at Australia's Regional Processing Centre in Nauru, 31 August 2015.
5 For an excellent, more detailed Christian response to regional processing, please see pg 11 of A Flourishing Society: Federal Election 2016 produced by Uniting Justice.
6 ‘Average Time in Detention: Days’ by the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre.
7 Q & A on Access to Legal Advice on Nauru by the Law Council Australia.
8 Shelter from the Storm A Uniting Church in Australia Statement on Asylum Seeker & Refugee Policy Adopted by the Fourteenth Assembly July 2015 Resolution 15.23.09, pg 37.
9 Asylum seekers and refugees: what are the facts? by Janet Phillips, 2 March 2015.